Hi Joanne,
This is confusing stuff. Basically, the training and certification a CET receives ONLY allows them to administer pentobarbital for the purposes of euthanasia in California shelters. That is the ONLY controlled drug just having a CET allows them to administer.
Note that in states where oral Pentobarbital is not prohibited (which given references to human physician assisted suicide it does not appear to be prohibited in CA) it can be given as a pre-euthanasia sedative orally (but it does have a bitter taste and should be followed by IV injection once appropriate sedation is seen). See page 30 of this reference: https://humanepro.org/sites/default/files/documents/euthanasia-reference-manual.pdf
In order for any non-DVM or non-RVT to administer any other controlled drug (other than Pentobarbital) in a CA shelter that is operating with a VMB Premises Permit the California Veterinary Medicine Board now requires those individuals to hold a VACSP. The VACSP requirement is a relatively newer thing (went into effect in 2016).
So, at this time for a CET to be able to administer any other controlled drug (other than Pentobarbital) in the shelter setting they would ALSO need to have a VACSP. Take a look at this FAQ page on the CA VMB website for some more info. https://vmb.ca.gov/applicants/vacsp_faq.shtml
From that FAQ also VACSP's can administer controlled drugs under "indirect" supervision of a DVM.
"Provisions of the VACSP permit do allow a permit holder to obtain or administer controlled substances under the indirect supervision of a licensed Veterinarian."
The best recommendation would be to ensure that enough of your staff hold a VACSP that you are able to administer controlled drugs in your shelter for all needs - animals on controlled drugs for pain/anxiety/seizures/etc. and for pre-euthanasia purposes.
For CA VMB definitions/guidance on direct vs indirect supervision check this page where this is stated: https://www.vmb.ca.gov/applicants/vet_office_staff.shtml
"Tip: Direct supervision means the DVM is present and is quickly available where the animal healthcare task is being performed. Indirect supervision means the DVM is not present, but has given instructions for the animal's care."
I hope this is helpful. One of the reasons a lot of this information is a little difficult to weed through is because most CA VMB guidance is aimed at veterinary clinics, not specifically addressing the shelter setting. That means we need to spend some time reviewing the guidance and regulations out there and do our best to interpret for the shelter setting where there is any lack of specific direction and clarity for our situations in shelters.
As an aside, in CA shelters we do consider the use of written protocols - created by a CA licensed DVM - to be an acceptable practice.
I hope this is helpful. If I hear any additional or different information I'll update my response.
Cindi
------------------------------
Cindi Delany, DVM, KPA-CTP, FFCP
Director of Online Learning
Maddie's Million Pet Challenge
UC Davis Koret Shelter Medicine Program
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 10-24-2023 10:03 PM
From: Joanne Lin
Subject: DEA Controlled Drug and Premises Permit Regulations - DECODED! - On-demand course available now!
Hi - sorry to circle back to this again, but wanted to ask what Bruce meant at the 29-minute mark of the webinar "...and that sedative is not authorized to be given by the CET, or - let me take that back - if they can give it, but it has to be prescribed by a veterinarian..." - so, if a veterinarian (specifically the DEA-licensed DVM) prescribes the sedative for euthanasia, say having a standing order of a certain mg/kg of Telazol IM PRN for (any) euthanasia, would this enable the CET to give the sedative? Or if the DEA-vet prescribes the sedative specifically for that patient, but is not in the room (how "indirect" is indirect supervision?) Or are CETs not allowed to handle any controlled substance other than sodium pentobarbital, ever, period? (I thought there was some link made between clients being able to administer DEA-DVM-prescribed controlled substances at home and shelter employees being able to do something similar in the shelter since the DEA-DVM prescribed it and is at least "indirectly" supervising, though I might have made that up since technically they aren't the owner)
------------------------------
Joanne Lin
staff veterinarian
Peninsula Humane Society & SPCA
CA
Original Message:
Sent: 10-16-2023 04:54 PM
From: Cindi Delany
Subject: DEA Controlled Drug and Premises Permit Regulations - DECODED! - On-demand course available now!
WEBINAR Q&A - Question #12
QUESTION:
Certified Euthanasia Technicians (CETs) and Veterinary Assistant Controlled Substances Permit (VACSP).
What can CETs and VACSPs do and not do in California?
ANSWER:
CET's are individuals who have completed an 8 hour euthanasia training program. They are allowed to dispense and administer the drug, Sodium Pentobarbital ONLY, in performing euthanasia.
VACSPs are individuals in California who have a current VACSP Permit. They are allowed to dispense and administer controlled drugs in the shelter setting following the prescription of a DEA registrant DVM.
A single individual can (and in most cases should) hold both a CET and VACSP to be allowed to perform both euthanasia with sodium pentobarbital and administration of controlled drugs for any prescribed purpose in the shelter setting.
Specific Questions on this topic and short answers below:
Q: Do CETs require a DVM on-site to euthanize or can they do it themselves alone? I'm in NY, so CA regulations may not be the same.
A: In CA individuals who are a CET may euthanize without a DVM present on-site following their shelter's protocols for this procedure. For animals within the holding period there are certain exceptions to euthanasia in general (irremediably suffering, unweaned and without maternal support, documented by authorities as dangerous/vicious)l, unrelated to who is doing the euthanasia.
If you are not in California we recommend you check your own states laws for further information.
Q1: However if they have their permit the CET would be able to give the sedation / anesthesia under the supervision of the veterinarian, yes?
Q2: Can a CET administer controlled drugs for euthanasia sedation without a VACSP?
Q3: Can a CET administer controlled drugs if a DVM prescribes it and is on-site?
Q4: Regarding CETs administering sodium pentobarbital. They can open a lock box with one open bottle to draw up the drug and administer with approval from their vet?
Q5: Do CET also need VACSP?
Q6: Following up in the field would we not be beholden to the rule that anything beyond euthanasia solution would require an RVT or VCSP. So CET would not be sufficient for Telazol?
SUMMARY ANSWER:
In CA, in shelters with a premises permit, CETs who are not VACSP holders (and not RVTs or field officers) are only authorized to administer pentobarbital. In order to administer other controlled drugs in the shelter setting non RVT, non DVM shelter staff would need to have a VACSP and those other drugs would need to be prescribed by a DEA registrant DVM.
See question #10 about field officer use of controlled drugs in the field under specific conditions.
------------------------------
Cindi Delany, DVM, KPA-CTP, FFCP
Director of Online Learning
Maddie's Million Pet Challenge
UC Davis Koret Shelter Medicine Program
Original Message:
Sent: 10-16-2023 03:51 PM
From: Cindi Delany
Subject: DEA Controlled Drug and Premises Permit Regulations - DECODED! - On-demand course available now!
Last Wednesday, 10/11/23, we took a deep dive into decoding DEA controlled drug regulations and premises permits (with a specific look at California-specific regs).
Both the recorded webinar and an on-demand course are available now on Maddie's University.
#AccesstoCare
#LawsandPublicPolicy
#OrganizationalManagement
------------------------------
Cindi Delany
UC Davis Koret Shelter Medicine Program
Davis CA
------------------------------