This is an interesting article. I haven't really thought about how the term 'access to care' meaning different things to different people might alter perception of how to fix the issue.
Additionally, the fact that the results were almost fully electronically driven. If access to care is an issue for these populations, I wonder how much it would be different if we were talking to a demographic who doesn't regularly use or have access to the internet. Surveying pet food pantry seekers as they come for example.
It will be a difficult conversation that access to care veterinarians typically means less access to a vet (or more time) as the study indicates wanting. I think this is an education gap for people; or maybe something that access to care clinics can alter. But the model for access to care to be successful does tend to be more clients to help make up for the deficit. Seems the client will always be left wanting.
------------------------------
Rachel Ide
Animal Services Director
Young-Williams Animal Center
TN
------------------------------