In my experience, foster programs work best when they're treated like a core part of the shelter-not an add-on. When fosters feel supported, communicated with, and genuinely appreciated, they step up in incredible ways. When that connection gets replaced with more generic communication or tighter restrictions, you almost always see engagement drop.
We've seen that firsthand at the Dubuque Regional Humane Society. When our foster program didn't have dedicated coordination, it kind of existed-but barely. Maybe a dozen animals a year went into foster care, and honestly tracking wasn't even consistent. Once we invested in a real foster coordinator role and focused on relationships and follow-up, it completely changed our capacity. At times, nearly half of our animals have been in foster, and the impact on space, stress levels, and staff workload has been huge.
That shift didn't just help animals; it also had very real operational benefits. Less crowding in the shelter, more time for staff to focus on the animals who are still in-house, and a calmer environment overall. It also can absolutely save money, especially when you factor in staff time, supplies, and daily care costs. In our case, having more animals in foster meant our animal care teams could spend more meaningful time on enrichment and individual care instead of just trying to keep up with volume. I think sometimes the operational and financial upside of a strong foster program gets overlooked. Execs are often looking closely at budgets (rightfully so) so this may help them see some benefits they might be overlooking.
Thank you for everything you're doing for the animals in your care. It's not easy work, especially when you can clearly see better solutions from where you stand day to day. I really hope you're able to make some progress in strengthening the foster program!
------------------------------
Jordan Hoftender
Director of Development
Dubuque Regional Humane Society
IA
------------------------------