There's some research that supports implementation of a mid-day "quiet time" in a shelter to allow dogs to rest and have a break from the stress of shelter traffic. Of course, there's also research showing the benefits of dog play groups, dog walks, and other activities that can't be done during a quiet time. I think the question is really whether the benefits outweighs the costs, and that will vary.
The most important consideration when implementing any change like this is to evaluate results and adapt as needed. The shelter may have metrics they're trying to improve - noise levels, length-of-stay, bite incidents. Hopefully they have a system for collecting feedback and making adjustments. That may be weekly staff meetings or something else. If you have any observations you think would be helpful for them to consider as things move forward, pass them along to the appropriate staff person.
Ideally, a shelter would have the capacity to track how each dog is doing behaviorally and make adjustments as needed: increase walks and play groups for a frustrated dog, move a more overwhelmed dog to a quieter kennel and provide more quiet time, move dogs out to foster where needed and possible. That doesn't apply for many shelters; they may need to take more broad approaches based on what they believe will help the majority of the population.
I think it's worth seeing how this plays out. The results may surprise you. And if it goes the other way and the dogs end up more stressed and frustrated, shelter leadership will most likely see that and adjust course. The fact that they are making major operational adjustments to reduce shelter stress indicates that they are invested in helping the dogs feel better. They have almost certainly put a great deal of thought into this decision, balancing the same concerns you have.
------------------------------
Karen Green, CAWA
Consultant
Ask Karen Green
askkarengreen@gmail.comaskkarengreen.com
------------------------------