Hi Kallie! The thing the bird advocates need to understand is that TNVR is the ONLY effective, humane option for managing free-roaming cat populations. Culling, or catch and kill, doesn't work even if one is ethically ok with that approach. There are so many awesome, and sometimes horrifying, studies performed over the course of decades in numerous locations that demonstrate its ineffectiveness. It is fine to promote confining pet cats indoors (for the benefit of the cats and wildlife) but, globally, free-roaming cat populations are self-sustaining and perpetuating even without human support (also demonstrated in studies on isolated, uninhabited islands) so feeding bans or other attempts at regulation will not impact those populations, are expensive, and are impossible to enforce. On the flip side, there is an ever-increasing body of evidence demonstrating the positive impact of TNVR.
The key is to stop fighting with bird groups. Free-roaming cats do significant damage to native bird populations (also well-documented) so claiming that the real threat is climate change or habitat loss or windmills is a waste of breath. Agree with them. The free-roaming cats are a problem...let's work together to stabilize and, hopefully, decrease the population over time through TNVR. That requires continual, sustained efforts and TNVR is the only viable option, at least until non-surgical sterilization alternatives become widely commercially available and economical (this is likely years away). Get them on board with helping spread this message :-)
Let me know if you need citations!
------------------------------
Rachel Powell DVM
Director of Surgery
Greenhill Humane Society
Eugene, OR
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 10-01-2025 02:17 PM
From: Kallie Laity
Subject: Disturbing Smithsonian publication
This is an excellent idea. I will be working with our local Audubon Organization to collaborate on the TNR efforts. It's difficult to get outsiders to understand TNR in general, so this will be a feat, but hopefully one with a great result. What would you tell the bird advocates in order to convince them?
------------------------------
Kallie Laity
Owner
Kitty Kisses Rescue of Reno
NV
Original Message:
Sent: 09-30-2025 02:33 PM
From: Rachel Powell
Subject: Disturbing Smithsonian publication
I think the animal welfare world would be wise to speak up and remind the bird advocates that the TNR advocates are NOT their enemies. We can agree that outdoor cats are problematic in the environment AND that culling is ineffective and inhumane. Just imagine the power if the two sides could align to fund TNR campaigns and put out PR about the partnership between companion animal and wildlife advocates? We could correct so much misinformation working together :-)
------------------------------
Rachel Powell DVM
Director of Surgery
Greenhill Humane Society
Eugene, OR
Original Message:
Sent: 09-21-2025 06:44 AM
From: Carolyn Kostera
Subject: Disturbing Smithsonian publication
Stories to fuel your mind
The Moral Cost of Cats
A bird-loving scientist calls for an end to outdoor cats "once and for all."
Smithsonian Magazine- Rachel E. Gross
- Rachel E. Gross is the Science Editor for Smithsonian Magazine
- This post originally appeared on Smithsonian Magazine and was published September 20, 2016. This article is republished here with permission
I remember seeing this article the first time around. Seems that Rachel is having difficulty finding more positive, productive material to present. I would like to see this negative propaganda challenged, enlightening (OK, that may be a very tall order!), the promoters . Author Pete Marra seems to have limited interests and abilities but much free time to focus on something he feels can be easily, and probably enjoyably, rectified by eliminating the problem. Perhaps a good therapist recommendation would help him out????
#CommunityCatManagement
------------------------------
Carolyn Kostera
NA
------------------------------