That's a great point. We're foster-based, so while we don't house owned/stray/seized animals together, we do see a wide range of backgrounds and temperaments. What's worked for us is putting a lot of focus on matching each dog to the right foster home from the start. It helps manage risk for the volunteer while also setting the dog up for success.
We've found it useful to tier volunteer involvement. New fosters or volunteers usually start with dogs that are easier or lower-risk, and as they gain more experience (and confidence), we'll place them with dogs who may need more structure, training, or patience. That way people aren't thrown into situations they may not be ready for.
It might be something to adapt in your setting too - letting volunteers "graduate" into certain categories of animals once they feel prepared.
------------------------------
Julie Beatty
Grants Coordinator
Ziva Dog Rescue
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 09-19-2025 04:31 PM
From: Rachel Cumming
Subject: Owned animals vs strays vs seized animals
How to develop a volunteer program in a shelter with multiple categories of pets such as owned animals vs strays vs seized animals?
My shelter has all three, and they are housed mainly together.
While there is less risk associated with volunteers interacting with stray animals, the risks of a volunteer taking a dog for a walk in the community when it has been seized under the Animal Protection Act introduces a degree of risk for the volunteer that many would find unacceptable. Is anyone else dealing with an issue like this?
#OrganizationalManagement
------------------------------
Rachel Cumming
Animal Welfare Volunteer Coordinator
Animal Care and Control
AB
------------------------------